tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post8053377955517891658..comments2023-06-18T09:57:56.075-04:00Comments on Dead Theologians: TATTOOS-Part 1Dead Theologianshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04749051924964777945noreply@blogger.comBlogger161125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-4106832871565040792007-08-29T19:11:00.000-04:002007-08-29T19:11:00.000-04:00workman," will not play word games with you. You k...workman,<BR/><BR/>" will not play word games with you. You know what you are inferring. <BR/>Repeating the same thing over and over does not make it true, although that concept is commonly taught in today's institutes of "higher learning""<BR/><BR/>btw I have no "higher learning" so I cannot honestly state I know what you mean by that... I do have "Higher Learning" as I have studied the bible for many years... and still admit i know less now than when I started! LOL!<BR/><BR/><BR/>I went back and re-read your comments to me and now i am even more confused..... i have no idea what this is referring to though you claim I do... Let me fill you in... I am engaged in about 6 or 7 different "conversations" I may miss someones post yet i am not out to purposely misrepresent someones' view.<BR/><BR/>I often ask for clarification... and have with you...<BR/><BR/>On the "remnant" I have read at least in two different places what seems to be the same as i believe, yet again, if I am missing something let me know...<BR/><BR/>I do not appreciate the tone you are taking with me... I know we had a rocky start and still do most probably disagree on some things, yet I am not unreasonable nor am I one to only think I am always correct as you have asserted about me... I may be certain of things... and confident in my beliefs, but don't confuse that with a lack of humility or arrogance on my part. I have gone through a lot and have lost a lot by what God has taught me... so I know what it means to sacrifice and stand on what i believe.<BR/><BR/>Blessings,<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-25671207549945818182007-08-29T18:53:00.000-04:002007-08-29T18:53:00.000-04:00workman,"I don't believe in a "pre-trib" rapture e...workman,<BR/><BR/>"I don't believe in a "pre-trib" rapture either and I don't believe that you even understand my comments."<BR/><BR/>At this point I am not sure I want to! LOL! <BR/><BR/>It seems that whatever I state you say I do not understand of agree with... <BR/><BR/>Please let me know... I guess i am confused as again I thought we agreed yet now I don't even understand your comments...<BR/><BR/>I see that the Jew and Gentile are both saved by Grace through faith in Jesus Christ... do you disagree with that?<BR/><BR/>Do you disagree that these Jews born of the Spirit are the "remnant" Paul speaks of in Romans?<BR/><BR/>These were MY questions as from what you stated it seemed we agreed.<BR/><BR/>blessings,<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-48381542981501909662007-08-29T13:36:00.000-04:002007-08-29T13:36:00.000-04:00iggy I don't believe in a "pre-trib" rapture eithe...iggy <BR/>I don't believe in a "pre-trib" rapture either and I don't believe that you even understand my comments.approvedworkmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16549993711638263022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-44571283963389962422007-08-29T11:36:00.000-04:002007-08-29T11:36:00.000-04:00workman,Then we seem to be in agreement on this......workman,<BR/><BR/>Then we seem to be in agreement on this... for the most part. LOL!<BR/><BR/>Though much of my view is far from pretrib rapture, (I do believe in the resurrection of the dead, but I do not see the rapture in scripture... I used to them I started to study it out and began to see it less and less) I am not just writing it off as I hope it happens, but I just do not honestly see it as I study the bible and look at history... <BR/><BR/>Yet, I still see that Jesus will come and reign... on earth. <BR/><BR/>Now saying that I do not see that Paul is teaching that the "Nation" of Israel will be saved, but "For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel." so I see that those that have the Spiritual birth are the true Son of the Adoption...<BR/><BR/><BR/>Blessings,<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-60903807141998531542007-08-29T10:40:00.000-04:002007-08-29T10:40:00.000-04:00No, I believe that many jews have come to Christ. ...No, I believe that many jews have come to Christ. Let's start with the 12 apostles, the 3000 on Penetecost, Saul/Paul himself. Paul already knew that many jews were believers so the partial hardening is referring to a remnant beyond that. <BR/><BR/><BR/>I am also aware that remnant Israel is elect of God by grace. since Paul is writing about Jacob and Esau.The remnant of grace exists in the natural.<BR/>There is currently an eretz Israel, and even from 70 AD on there has been a nation of Israel which existed and exists in the diaspora. The jews are scattered throughout the earth even now. In the exile, and other such events, the nation of Israel existed as a remnant. They are what Paul is speaking of, Ezra, Nehemiah, Haggai, Zechariah, Zerubbabel, Jeshua, etc<BR/>So I say again God is not done with the people of the "nation" of Israel.The remnant is waiting, though for the time being, in ignorance amongst the scattered jews and the ones who currently live in the land of Israel..approvedworkmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16549993711638263022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-42088911674164654802007-08-28T20:36:00.000-04:002007-08-28T20:36:00.000-04:00workman,Then you believe (I am asking for clarity ...workman,<BR/><BR/>Then you believe (I am asking for clarity here) that a Jew cannot be saved until the hardening is removed?<BR/><BR/>I think you miss that the "remnant" is of Grace not of the Nation or of natural birth.<BR/><BR/>Blessings,<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-23955302319020850502007-08-28T20:20:00.000-04:002007-08-28T20:20:00.000-04:00I believed I mentioned the remnant.The question is...I believed I mentioned the remnant.<BR/>The question is, has the partial hardening been removed.<BR/>If not, then there is still a remnant.I do not believe that it has<BR/>Even if the majority of the remnant exists in the jews still dispersed, all jews of the diaspora are citizens of the nation of Israel according to the OT no matter where they live, and of course there is still the portion of the remnant that resides in Israel. They are waiting, though unknowingly, to become part of true Israel, the church.<BR/>Therefore there is still unfinished business in eretz Israel.approvedworkmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16549993711638263022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-14961031829977715702007-08-28T19:29:00.000-04:002007-08-28T19:29:00.000-04:00workman,"So,.....That would mean that there are je...workman,<BR/><BR/>"So,.....<BR/>That would mean that there are jews who are born again, as not all the original branches were broken off."<BR/><BR/>do you deny then that there are a remnant of Jews as taught in Romans 9?<BR/> 5. Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen. <BR/> 6. It is not as though God's word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. <BR/> 7. Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham's children. On the contrary, "It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned." <BR/> 8. In other words, it is not the natural children who are God's children, but it is the children of the promise who are regarded as Abraham's offspring. <BR/><BR/>I see there that there are Jews that are born of the Spirit... and that would mean that "there are jews who are born again, as not all the original branches were broken off."<BR/><BR/>It seems that the rest of your comment is in line with what I have already stated... <BR/><BR/>So? <BR/><BR/>Are you agruing agaisnt me, it is hard with your comment to tell.<BR/><BR/>Be blessed,<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-83516459442798115622007-08-28T19:15:00.000-04:002007-08-28T19:15:00.000-04:00Jesus wrestled with man and with God?? Where did y...Jesus wrestled with man and with God?? Where did you get that?<BR/><BR/>Romans 11:<BR/>"17But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, although a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing root of the olive tree, 18do not be arrogant toward the branches. If you are, remember it is not you who support the root, but the root that supports you."<BR/><BR/>iggy said:<BR/>"those who were born of the flesh Jewish (descendants of Abraham) are the branches that are broken off as they are not born of faith." <BR/><BR/>So,.....<BR/>That would mean that there are jews who are born again, as not all the original branches were broken off.<BR/><BR/>Israel is what it has always been, jew and gentile who have believed by faith which was accounted to them as righteousness. Israel are all who believe like Abraham and therefore are the beneficiaries of the Covenant that was given to him.<BR/>On the other hand There is still the remnant that is yet to believe, so "eretz" Israel cannot be discounted.approvedworkmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16549993711638263022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-6792329566932315532007-08-28T16:30:00.000-04:002007-08-28T16:30:00.000-04:00DT,"Of course this opens a whole 'nother conversat...DT,<BR/><BR/>"Of course this opens a whole 'nother conversation but the church cannot be Israel. Israel is still Israel. :)"<BR/><BR/>Jesus is the New Israel that we are all grafted on to by faith... He is the Tree... It was He who wrestled both with man and God like Jacob.<BR/><BR/>So though there is a physical Israel, it is the shadow of the reality that is Jesus. This is taught in Romans 11 though I will acknowledge the words "New Israel" is not there... but the thought is...<BR/><BR/>Israel where the chosen people but since they did not fulfill the Abrahamic covenant, Jesus came to fulfill it for them (this was the original plan but God used Israel as an object lesson of sorts.)<BR/><BR/>In that now we are a chosen people as we are saved by Grace through Faith and grafted on to Jesus... He then become this New Israel. Again this is related to the other post you have on How dead is Dead in which those who were born of the flesh Jewish (descendants of Abraham) are the branches that are broken off as they are not born of faith. While the gentiles that are born of faith are grafted onto Jesus... the Tree of Life.<BR/><BR/>It is there, one just need to look.<BR/><BR/>Be Blessed,<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-47016589322107112172007-08-28T14:27:00.000-04:002007-08-28T14:27:00.000-04:00iggyI will not play word games with you. You know ...iggy<BR/>I will not play word games with you. You know what you are inferring. <BR/>Repeating the same thing over and over does not make it true, although that concept is commonly taught in today's institutes of "higher learning"<BR/><BR/><BR/>dss<BR/>I lean more to the side of reformed/calvinistic theology. I do have a problem with limited atonement.<BR/>The article I linked to from the Puritan's Mind site also reflects much of what I believe. In fact teaching such as that makes me want to shout Hallelujah, more than any of the manipulative charismatic/pentecostal/emergent/<BR/>postmodern teachers that are around.<BR/>My focus is on Scripture alone and then how the teachings of others stand up against them.<BR/> <BR/>That being said I don't argue things like musical styles,do we wear suits, and such. The Gospel is not a westernized anglo gospel. <BR/><BR/>I do agree in that true Israel is both jew and gentile. The over-arching covenant is the one God made with Abraham. <BR/>The jews rejected the message as God placed a partial hardening upon them. So Paul says when the times of the gentiles are fulfilled, then the veil will be lifted for remnant jews and as Paul says in that way ALL Israel will be saved. All Israel is both jew and gentile and according to Ephesians 2 that would be the Body of Christ, i.e. the Church. <BR/>A pox on John Hagee, Tim LeHaye, and others for the unscriptural message they bring.approvedworkmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16549993711638263022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-52439810530238776952007-08-28T11:13:00.000-04:002007-08-28T11:13:00.000-04:00Here goes, DT. Any dispy buddies out there care t...Here goes, DT. <BR/><BR/>Any dispy buddies out there care to parley?<BR/><BR/>The following are a few OT verses that refer to Israel. These verses are then quoted again in the NT referring to Christians. <BR/><BR/>I can't type all of them out, there are too many. <BR/><BR/>Lev. 26:11-12: "I will put my dwelling place among you, and I will not abhor you. I will walk among you and be your God, and you will be my people." <BR/><BR/>2 Cor. 6:16: "What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols? For we are the temple of the living God. As God has said: 'I will live with them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be my people.'" <BR/><BR/>Paul is writing to Gentile Christians applying the prophecies to the Church of Christ. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that Paul regards the Christians as the real Israel of God, now under a covenant which has no need for stone and wood temples, or for genealogical restrictions. <BR/><BR/>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <BR/>Psalm 130:8: "He himself will redeem Israel from all their sins." <BR/><BR/>Titus 2: 14: "who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness...." <BR/>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <BR/>Isaiah 52: 7: "How beautiful on the mountains are the feet of those who bring good news..." <BR/><BR/>Romans 10: 15: "And how can they preach unless they are sent? As it is written, 'How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!'" <BR/><BR/>In Isaiah, the messengers go to desolate Jerusalem. In the NT, the messengers go into the world of sinners. This results in conversion. Paul strips the Isaiah passage of its race consciousness and geography. He refers it to the New Israel, the Christian Church. <BR/><BR/>---------------------------------------------------------------------------- <BR/><BR/>Joel 2:32: "And everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved; for on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there will be deliverance, as the Lord has said, among the survivors whom the Lord calls." <BR/><BR/>Romans 10: 13: "for, Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved." <BR/><BR/>Here Joel gives the location of where people will call upon the Lord, Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, places quite remote from Rome, where the people Paul was writing to lived. How could Paul apply this passage to Christians? The only way is if this passage has been taken from "racial Israel" and now it belongs to the true Israel...the Church.Deborahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00500233886533478141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-51257113680804624392007-08-28T08:47:00.000-04:002007-08-28T08:47:00.000-04:00dss,Please do elaborate. But watch out...my dispy ...dss,<BR/><BR/>Please do elaborate. But watch out...my dispy buddies might come out of the woodwork. :)<BR/><BR/>DTDead Theologianshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04749051924964777945noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-12632961419326495732007-08-28T08:32:00.000-04:002007-08-28T08:32:00.000-04:00Hello DT,I have so enjoyed your blog and the discu...Hello DT,<BR/><BR/>I have so enjoyed your blog and the discussions that are present. Thank you for allowing me to participate.<BR/><BR/>If it is o.k., I would like to clarify. I do believe this to be relevant to the discussion that has ensued concerning the OT and its relevance for the church today.<BR/><BR/>After centures of Israelite rebellion against God, which culminated in their rejection of Jesus the Messiah, the titles, attributes, and blessings of Israel were transferred to all those who are in Jesus Christ, and to no one else regardless of Abrahamic descent. Therefore, the Church is Israel now....<BR/><BR/>Membership in Israel now is a matter of faith, not race.<BR/><BR/>Because of this, the OT blessings and cursings upon Israel, are relevant to the Church today.<BR/><BR/>Israel is just a geographical location over in the Middle East and is no more favored in God's eyes than Iraq or Iran.Deborahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00500233886533478141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-28957908227079082512007-08-28T07:52:00.000-04:002007-08-28T07:52:00.000-04:00Iggy,You said "Yet, there are many out there too b...Iggy,<BR/><BR/>You said "Yet, there are many out there too busy declaring war to actually listen to us emerging folk to really understand what we do believe and would rather make things up and say we beleive in their straw-men and fantasy games of war"<BR/><BR/>If you will give me a couple of days I am goig to have a post dealing with the Emerging issue. I would welcome you to dine with us on that one.<BR/><BR/>DTDead Theologianshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04749051924964777945noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-87736865729314786242007-08-28T07:48:00.000-04:002007-08-28T07:48:00.000-04:00dsstanfield,Of course this opens a whole 'nother c...dsstanfield,<BR/><BR/>Of course this opens a whole 'nother conversation but the church cannot be Israel. Israel is still Israel. :)<BR/><BR/>DTDead Theologianshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04749051924964777945noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-83745147570272316312007-08-28T07:33:00.000-04:002007-08-28T07:33:00.000-04:00dsstanfield,You don't need not apologize to me abo...dsstanfield,<BR/><BR/>You don't need not apologize to me about "postmodernism" as there is a great misrepresentations to what we in emerging beleive about it...<BR/><BR/>We use the tools of postmodernism as we and yourself use the tools of modernism... yet we are well aware of the anti-Christian philosophy that is of both modernity and post-modernity...<BR/><BR/>I can only hope to understand those lost to the post-modern mindset to explain why it is still leads one to death and that Jesus is the only way to Life.<BR/><BR/>Yet, there are many out there too busy declaring war to actually listen to us emerging folk to really understand what we do believe and would rather make things up and say we beleive in their straw-men and fantasy games of war...<BR/><BR/><BR/>You do not know how many times I am condemned for defending the biblical definition of truth over the definitions from modernity that have infused themselves into Christian thought... in fact I find it ironic that I being of emerging who supposedly denies "truth" debate those who claim that for a pure biblical understanding verses the modernity and Platonist dualism that has corrupted many peoples understanding of scripture...<BR/><BR/>Be blessed,<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-16116685308746602312007-08-28T07:22:00.000-04:002007-08-28T07:22:00.000-04:00Good morning Henry (rick)!"They are taught to Isra...Good morning Henry (rick)!<BR/><BR/>"They are taught to Israel and can be taught in the comntext of truth, but they are not CHURCH doctrines, they apply outside the church as well."<BR/><BR/>Herein lies the problem betwixt the two of us. Don't fall off your chair when you read this, but I would like to make the assertion that:<BR/><BR/>THE CHURCH IS ISRAEL NOW. <BR/> <BR/>*Gasp......*<BR/><BR/>For the record, I was once about as Dispensational as one can get. I remember days when I just sat around waiting on the rapture. I was constantly trying to figure out whether it was Bill or Hillary who was the antichrist. (If I still thought that way, my vote today would definitely go to Hillary.)<BR/><BR/>I believe Dispensationalism has had a hand in our country's problems today. It has made Christians lazy. After all, who wants to get involved in politics or making our country a better place? For the average Dispensationalist that would just be polishing brass on a sinking ship. Few Christians vote, few run for office..... We have allowed the liberal minority to run our Christian nation. We have allowed millions of innocent babies to be murdered, while paying for it with our taxes.<BR/><BR/>I am not blaming all of our problems on Dispensationalism; weak and shallow topical preaching has had its hand in the decline of our nation as well. Post modernism (sorry iggy) and her sisters pragmatism and relativism have also wreaked havoc in our evangelical churches today. Absolute truth.....what does that look like?????<BR/><BR/>What about Deuteronomy 28?Deborahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00500233886533478141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-64085162876811157572007-08-27T22:36:00.000-04:002007-08-27T22:36:00.000-04:00Everyone,Not to get you off this post or anymore o...Everyone,<BR/><BR/>Not to get you off this post or anymore off subject but I would be interested to hear your comments on the newest post "How Dead is Dead?"<BR/><BR/>Thanks,<BR/>DTDead Theologianshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04749051924964777945noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-20762604353162599892007-08-27T21:04:00.000-04:002007-08-27T21:04:00.000-04:00workman,"Acts 4:31And when they had prayed,the pla...workman,<BR/><BR/><BR/>"Acts 4:<BR/>31And when they had prayed,the place in which they were gathered together was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and continued to speak the word of God with boldness.<BR/><BR/>Would this not be a "re-filling"?<BR/>As for second blessings,I have nothing to do with it."<BR/><BR/>So are you asserting that man can lose salvation then be re-saved again? Again the idea of "filling" is different... we can be filled again... but we are sealed now as far as salvation.<BR/><BR/>The re-filling is the empowering... as it was in the OT that has not changed... yet what has is that we now can have the certainty that even King David did not have.<BR/><BR/>Be Blessed,<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-51106796530337229282007-08-27T20:59:00.000-04:002007-08-27T20:59:00.000-04:00workman,if i was "sedevacantist papist" I would ho...workman,<BR/><BR/>if i was "sedevacantist papist" I would hold that we are never certain to our salvation... <BR/><BR/>I am certain of my salvation.<BR/><BR/>Now, remember that Calvin was highly influenced by Augustine and St. Barnard... both pretty much entrenched in the Roman Catholic Church as well as both will in the mystical school of said Roman Catholic Church, so actually if you are a Calvinist you have a more pure linage to Catholicmom that I will ever have. I am not a Calvinist nor am I Arminian... I view both as missing the point.<BR/><BR/>Which was what I was trying explain to you while you began to call yourself names! LOL!<BR/><BR/>Be Blessed again!<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-73725012827562808522007-08-27T20:53:00.000-04:002007-08-27T20:53:00.000-04:00WOrkman,"ok iggy Now I am satanic. Henry says I'm ...WOrkman,<BR/>"ok iggy <BR/>Now I am satanic. Henry says I'm a jew. You sound like sedevacantist papists. What as hoot."<BR/><BR/>Which most like was what Luther stated to Zwingli! LOL! <BR/><BR/>Call yourself what you want as those words or even that thought never once crossed my mind... it originate again from you... <BR/><BR/>So in my most postmodern manner...<BR/><BR/>Whatever!<BR/><BR/>As far as the rest of your comment... there is a lot we do agree on... I am pointing out the subtle nuance you are missing... and that was all... you seem to be too defensive to even listen and have even now resorted to calling yourself names and implying I am doing that! <BR/><BR/>Please stop... that is very dishonest.<BR/><BR/>LOL!<BR/>Blessings,<BR/>iggyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08894632401827590745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-41827383938197508692007-08-27T20:01:00.000-04:002007-08-27T20:01:00.000-04:00Those doctrines you mentioned are not specific chu...Those doctrines you mentioned are not specific church doctrines. They are taught to Israel and can be taught in the comntext of truth, but they are not CHURCH doctrines, they apply outside the church as well. The ones I mentioned are exclusively the doctrines of the ecclesia.Rick Fruehhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05879848568892457571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-48610698076258288282007-08-27T19:27:00.000-04:002007-08-27T19:27:00.000-04:00Henry (rick):Can you produce a list of the 10 com...Henry (rick):<BR/><BR/>Can you produce a list of the 10 commandments from the NT?<BR/><BR/>How about the literal 6 day (24 hour) creation account?<BR/><BR/>What about the account of the Fall?<BR/><BR/>All of these are vital doctrines of the church found in the OT. Does Deuteronomy 28 apply to the church today?<BR/><BR/>D. StanfieldDeborahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00500233886533478141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29190761.post-8705638588144301432007-08-27T19:14:00.000-04:002007-08-27T19:14:00.000-04:00All the church doctrines:Justification by faithBap...All the church doctrines:<BR/><BR/>Justification by faith<BR/>Baptism<BR/>Lord's Supper<BR/>Church Offices<BR/>Gifts of the Spirit<BR/>The Bride of Christ<BR/>Christ the High Priest<BR/>The Trinity<BR/>Adoption<BR/>Advocate<BR/>Gospel<BR/>Resurrection<BR/>etc.<BR/><BR/>All must be taught in the New TestamentRick Fruehhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05879848568892457571noreply@blogger.com